![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LinksElection Projection TFA Forum Lucianne.com UK Telegraph Defend America Don't be offended if I don't reply. I'm not intentionally rude. Just very unorganized when it comes to email. Site Nav
August 2008 Movable Type
Syndicate this site (XML) Powered by |
March 11, 2008Lawmakers Pad Accounts with Per DiemThe Commercial Appeal has a rather inflammatory article about our state lawmakers pocketing per diem checks that far outweigh their base salary. But in my opinion, anyone who is making less than $20K per year doing a job that doesn't stop just because congress is in recess should be able to get reimbursed for continuing their work. Representatives were in session 81 days last year, making them eligible for $13,041 in per diem expenses (at $161/day). The senate sat for 77 days, so they could reasonably collect $12,397. Add on top of that Friday committee meetings, special hearings, a convention or three, and so on, and I can see that amount approaching $20K, effectively doubling their base salary. Then again:
Ah, now I see what the Commercial Appeal is upset about. Excessive junkets and "office work". Come one, the chick lives in Nashville. What does she do to with those $161 a day, spend it all on meals?
How refreshing. Ethical behavior. From Democrats, no less. Kudos. Top per diem recipients for 2007:
Technorati Tags: Ethics in Politics
Posted
on Tuesday at 10:22 PM
in category Ethics
Post a commentKeep a civil tongue in your head. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments