TennWatch.com / Volitics.com: Volunteer State Politics

Links

--- Election Info ---

Election Projection
Sabato's Crystal Ball

--- Gun Boards ---

TFA Forum
Gun Talk
The High Road

--- News Sources ---

Lucianne.com
Slashdot
F'd Company
Jewish World Review
Economist
Financial Times
Eureka Alert
Tech Central Station
Ananova
The Vanguard
Commercial Appeal
Astronomy POD

--- International ---

UK Telegraph
London Times
Financial Times
Intl. Herald Tribune
MEMRI

--- Columnists ---

Ann Coulter

--- Resources ---

Defend America
TN Tax Revolt
TN Digital Freedom Network
Thomas Legislative Information
Open Secrets
Political Money Line
GOA Tracked Votes
Shelby County GOP
Defense of Free Enterprise
AnimalRights.net

Don't be offended if I don't reply. I'm not intentionally rude. Just very unorganized when it comes to email.

Site Nav

--- Site Search ---
--- Archives ---

View Category List

August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
December 2007
September 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
June 2004
May 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
August 2003

Movable Type

Syndicate this site (XML)
Full Post with Comments
Full Post but No Comments
Partial Text: No Formatting
Comments Only Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.3

April 30, 2006

Taxes for Porn

The taxpayers of Tennessee should be outraged to discover that $34,500 of their money is being spent to subsidize the 37th annual Nashville Film Festival.

And while some may get angry at taxpayer money being used for sexually explicit films (like "Hung", in which lesbian friends experiment with penises), the real issue is why taxpayer money is being used at all. Drew Johnson, of the Tennessee Center For Policy Research, absolutely nails it with:

Films considered by some to be sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable garner greater public outrage for being shown at a taxpayer-supported film festival. Yet all taxpayers should be incensed that their tax money is spent to support art of any kind.

Government funding of the arts is inconsistent with a free society. Art—like all other goods and services—should exist in a market environment. If art is of value to a society, people will buy it, listen to it, watch it and enjoy it. It should not be a role of government to tax individuals to support art.

Eliminating government funding of the arts means that taxpayers would have more money to attend films that they personally choose to support. Instead, the state forces taxpayers to support films like Brothers of the Head, a mockumentary about Siamese twin glam rockers. This just goes to prove that the state government has no business spending our money on most of the things they spend it on.

Precisely.

Technorati Tags: , , , , .

 


Comments

Post a comment

Keep a civil tongue in your head.
Somebody's mother will be reading this blog!










Remember personal info?